Carbon Footprint Versus Fair Trade

For those of you unfamiliar with the term "carbonmetric tonnes of CO² (0.065 UK tons).
footprint" and its implications or are unsure what isEnergy efficiency is directly related to carbon dioxide
meant by "fair-trade" here is a brief explanation.emissions, rail would appear to be significantly more
Carbon footprint is defined by the UK carbon trust asenergy efficient then other transport modes, with the
being: " ..the total set of GHG (greenhouse gas)exception of shipping, aviation being the worst
emissions caused directly or indirectly by an individualoffender by far. Global emissions from varying
organization, event or product." In the context of thistransport modes account for approximately 23% of
article it applies specifically to carbon emissions giventhe total world CO² output according to "Japan
out by various transport modes during their endeavorsAutomobile Manufacturers Association."
to deliver commodities from A to B.The conclusions from these combined figures are that
And what is the significance?huge cuts need to be made to counter the rapid
Carbon dioxide "..is (at present) the principalincrease in trade volumes.
greenhouse gas" and the biggest cause of globalThere is, however, a glimmer of hope on the horizon
warming which is the process that raises the airfor the transport industry in the shape of bio fuels. Billy
temperature in the lower atmosphere due to heatGlover, Boeings chief environmental strategist feels
trapped by greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide,that bio fuels from algae, jatropha, camelina, halophytes
methane, nitrous oxide and chlorofluorocarbon (moreand palm oil will become tomorrows answer to
commonly known as cfc's).aviation fuel. Continental airlines have already
The implications are devastating to life on earth.conducted test flights using a mix of traditional based
Fair trade is defined in Wikipedia as an " ..organizedfuel with a mix of jatropha and 6% algae with
social movement and market based approach thatsatisfactory results. The initial aim is for a 60% lowering
aims to help developing countries and promoteof carbon emissions.
sustainability". The movement advocates the paymentOf course each solution has its own problems, cost is
of a "fair price" as well as social and environmentalinitially a problem along with the possibility of huge
standards in areas related to production . It focuses inareas of land being required for some of the crops
particular on exports from developing countries tomentioned. Glover says that "..the optimists say, to
developed countries most notably coffee, cocoa,supply the entire world with aviation fuel would
sugar, tea, flowers, wine, fresh fruit, bananas, chocolateperhaps need an area the size of Belgium." The
and handy crafts. In 2007 fair-trade certified salesprojected time scales are however, way off, with
heavily supported by supermarkets amounted to2025-2050 being banded around and as Professor
approx. $3.62 billion (£2.39 billion) world wide aJohn Schellnhuber, director of the Potsdam institute on
47% year to year increase. Fairtrade producesclimate change research, states "..we have maybe got
generally account for 1-20% of all sales in their product20 years" referring to the point of no return for carbon
category in Europe and North America. In 2003 "Catoemissions.
industries" vice president for research Brink LindseyThe worst case scenario for global warming has been
referred to fairtrade as "..well intentioned interventionsput forward by professor James Lovelock, a leading
scheme... doomed to end in failure." Fair trade,climate change scientist: "Global warming is irreversible
according to Lindsay, is a misguided attempt to makeand billions of people will die over the next century."
up for market failures in which one failed pricingClaiming that by 2100 "..much of the tropical land mass
structure is replaced with another. This is rather harsh,will become scrub and desert." This synopsis takes into
the principles of supply and demand which ultimatelyaccount the release of huge reservoirs of methane,
govern price still apply and if demand diminishes thepresently trapped below the tundra surface. Methane
price will ultimately reflect this. People will only payis 72x more effective at holding temperature than
higher prices for a commodity out of choice whilst theircarbon dioxide. He continues to say that the only place
budget can afford to do so.where humans will be able to survive will be the arctic.
Having given a brief interpretation of the factionsDr. Myles Allen, head of the climatic dynamics group at
involved you may well ask " what is the connectionOxford University's physics department said: "People
between carbon footprints, global finances andwill be killed by climatic change this century, arguably,
fair-trade?"this has started already with the 2003 heat wave in
To explain this we need to look a little deeper. Let'sEurope which killed 20,000-35,000 people including
look at the relative carbon footprints of the transport4,000 people in the UK."
industry. All vehicles are guilty of carbon pollution, butJohn Church from the centre for Australian weather
who are the worst offenders?and climate research when asked about global
Aviation.warming stated that "..no matter the exact amount of
The European commission said that greenhouse gassea level rise due to global warming the message
emissions from aviation has increases by 87% sincepresented is loud and clear, even at the lowest levels
1990. Boeing, the aircraft company, says that a Boeingof projected sea level rises in this century mean that
747 burns about 5 gallons of fuel per mile. Paul Charles,10% of the world's current population will be hit by rising
a Virgin Atlantic spokesman, says CO² emissionsseas."
on a normal flight are generally three times the fuelGeorge Monbiot an environmentalist states that we
burned. For example: A flight from Jorgeneed to cut carbon emissions by 90%, this includes a
Chávez international airport in Peru tocomplete moratorium on further flights and a great
Heathrow airport London UK a trip of 6314 milesreduction in the number of current flights.
(10,162 km) uses approx. 31,570 gallons of aviation fuelNow let's turn our attention to fair trade.
which in turn produces 358 tons (UK) of CO², aWhat a wonderful idea but at what cost? The
staggering amount.principles of fair trade already discussed have touched
Shipping.the compassionate nerve of the nation and the
John Vidal, environmental editor of the Guardian statessupermarkets are exploiting it for all its worth. It's a
that figures from the oil giant BP and researchers atshame that with every "fair-trade" item they don't put
the institute for physic and atmosphere in Wessing,a "carbon footprint" label.
Germany reveal that annual emissions from shippingIn a recent poll carried out by CBS, 78% of all
range between 600 - 800 million tonnes of carbonrespondents said that they "..think it is necessary to
dioxide. This is nearly double Britain's total emissionstake steps to counter the effects of global warming
and more than all the African countries combined.right away". Half of the 1,000 people interviewed by
However, as shipping conveys 90% of the world's"Populous" in research for "Walkers" the crisp
goods, each item carried therefore has amanufacturers, said they were more likely to buy a
proportionately smaller carbon footprint. Although this isproduct with a carbon label. But surely, and here lies
true it still shy's away from the point that giantthe dilemma, the two labels "fair trade" and "carbon
container ships like the "Emma Maersic" which burnsfootprint" are contradictory. To comply with fair-trade,
350 tons of fuel a day and according to an articlehelping third world nations, you have to create millions
dated February 13th in the Guardian titled "Globalof tons of destructive greenhouse gasses. For
CO² Emissions" states that a ship of this sizeexample, to bring fair-trade flowers to UK
"...can emit more than 300,000 tonnes of CO² asupermarkets from Kenya using Nairobi airport creates
year - equivalent to a medium-sized coal powera carbon footprint of approx. 167.508 tonnes (this is
station." So although each item carried might well havemade up of 0.118 tonnes for two 55 mile road journeys,
a tiny individual footprint, as a whole the ship has ato and from the airport, plus 167.29 tonnes from the air
colossal carbon footprint.miles) as opposed to the mere 0.118 tonnes to bring
Rail.UK flowers from UK local growers located in a 55 mile
Dirk Flege, managing director of the pro-rail alliance saidradius.
that "If we want to maintain mobility then there will beSo, as human beings have always regarded choice as
no way around a shift to the railways." Freight trainsa fundamental requirement for freedom and lifestyle,
produce only a quarter of the CO² emitted bywhat choice are you going to make when the chips
trucks on a ton for ton basis and for personalare really down?
transport CO² emissions are reduced by (atOn the one hand, support third world economies to
least) half when switching from cars to the railways,bring them fair recompense for what they do but at
again based on passengers carried, says the pro-railthe expense of the local markets and home grown
alliance. Rail at present has 12% of the UK surfaceindustries, or support local business and radically cut
freight market, and to give some idea of the scale ofcarbon emission therefore helping to save the planet
rail transport "..an aggregate freight train can carry asand its natural beauty for future generations. The
much freight as 120 HGV lorries" according to Newarkincredibly short sighted approach typified by the
Rail 2008. Rail overall produces 1.7% of the total UKsupermarket chains who have jumped on the "fair
emissions of Carbon dioxide according to Carbontrade" bandwagon for quick profit and a view to
Pathways DfT 2008.eliminating their competition must be seen for what it is,
Road.a cheap trick that's ultimately at our expense. They
Road transport alone accounts for 26% of all UKhave already put nails in the coffins of local butchers,
CO² emissions . The rail freight association hasgreengrocers, newsagents and florists, all of whom are
calculated that the CO² emissions of carryingnot entirely blameless in this scenario, selling
freight by heavy goods vehicles (HGV's) is 180g permerchandise manufactured or grown principally in
kilometre. There are of course so many variablesChina, South America and Africa. None of us are
effecting this figure including horse power, age ofexempt we all need to take responsibility for our
vehicle, congestion , tons of cargo etc. The departmentactions.
of transport estimates for a lorry carrying 20 tonnes,There are some very tough and uncomfortable
averaging 50 m.p.h. that it produces 670g per kilometredecisions ahead for human beings, the choice is of
or 1078g per mile. A HGV trip from Boston, Lincolnshirecourse yours.
to Nottingham, a distance of 55 miles creates 0.059So it all boils down to "what really matters to you?